(click on the image to view their gallery)
Since I celebrate individuality in all of its forms, it would be remiss to not include this treat from NY Times.
Tattoos have been evident in society since the beginning of mankind. Archaeologists have even found them on ancient mummies and frozen warriors (Otzi the Iceman is an example). They may stir controversy in “polite” society, but many see it as another form of self expression. Other cultures have viewed them as sacred rites of passage. Their significance changes from country to country, but the one constant is that those who have them stand apart from those who don’t. Some of the art might not be the greatest, but its acceptance by its owner is all that matters.
I don’t see a societal issue because this is a personal journey. It takes a lot of courage (or stupidity, if you were drunk) to let someone else change a personal part of you. Anyone who gets one feels the attachment to their tattoo because they have withstood the pain in order to acquire it. And believe me, some places on your body really hurt! That to me is the truest form of dedication to yourself. I should know because I have a small one, and I plan to get more (if I can ever get through Corey Miller’s waiting list). The chosen art and artist are two of the biggest decisions that you’ll ever make, because you’re changing yourself little by little in ways that are out of your control.
If you don’t like them, then don’t get one. But if you celebrate the human form, then this is just another way to do so. Again, to each their own. That should be where the argument ends.
